Go Screw Your Religion (Thank me later)
Do not get surprised or offended by such an
outrageous title of the post. And if you do, then do not kill me. I normally
keep opinions related to religion or spiritual beliefs to myself. I know
eyebrows will be raised and I will be judged for my opinions. I neither have
the energy nor the interest to defend my stand or my views to people who would
just want to align my views with theirs.
I used to be an atheist but tilted towards
being an agnostic over the last few years. I am not exactly proud of being a
Hindu or for that matter a Brahmin (no reservation quota, you know). While
growing up, I was equally inclined to Islamic & Christianity and never
could understand what differentiates ‘them’ from ‘us’. I remember asking my
friends to know who created this differentiation. At that age, they didn’t have
the answers nor did I. When I went to my parents, they only told me these are
beliefs that are there since centuries and being a part of ‘this’ religion; we
need to abide by it. But no concrete answer.
I had/have many non-Hindu friends. But when
I look back to the time when I became friends with them, I found out I didn’t
choose them to be my friend based on their surnames. I chose them because our
wavelength clicked. But now when I meet someone, I am programmed by the society
to look at him/her in a different way. It is only because of my education and
conscience that I look beyond their names. But I dread how easily can we be
trapped in these perceptions created by others.
Let’s now slightly move towards the
flipside of it. Every religion has its passive, active and extreme followers.
The problem generally begins with the extreme ones, for they are not followers,
they start taking the place of Gods people believe in. They start talking like
the custodians of their religion and for that reason also take the sole
responsibility to defend it. Who are they to defend? Who appointed them? And
what exactly are they defending? Whom are they defending? The answers to all
these will solve entire set of problems. In between these custodians, some have
gone all the way to kill people. They kill people, from all religion, including
theirs in the name of their God. More than 95% of such defenders of faith
belong to a specific religion. And they claim to be protecting the 1.7 billion
(or roughly 25% of world population) citizens in world belonging to them.
Now what can be done? Nothing, if we are to
continue this blame game and finding an escape route. Much, if ‘we’ take a
clear stand. Who are these ‘we’? It is those 1.7 billion people, nor the rest.
Because the rest have been condemning these terror attacks month after month,
year after year and decade after decade. The rest used to sulk at their homes,
now they do that at various social media platforms. But nothing will happen
with this shit. It is ‘if’ and ‘only if’ the educated class of the ‘religion of
peace’ will stand up and clearly denounce these acts. They must declare it loud
and clear that they or their God does not need to be defended by killing
people.
You ignore, boycott, ban, threaten and then
kill. I refuse to accept the fact that there would be any administration in the
world that would not listen to someone in the first 4 levels. And these
‘so-called’ defenders of their faith get on to level 5 directly for even a
satire on their God. On the contrary, other religions make and enjoy
full-length feature films on Gods. Dichotomy? It’s just the tolerance. It is
the tolerance towards others that defines the richness of our religion, culture
but most importantly our upbringing as a human being.
Now in 2015, we have got a new section of
people. They are called pseudo-liberals or terror apologists. They would defend
exactly the opposite the mainstream would be talking about. They would analyze
each move by the majority govt. but would overlook thousands of nonsensical
things being carried out by the minority. After each terror strike, they would
be the first ones to come out in saying that let’s not blame a whole religion,
let’s not use this as a platform to peddle terror by other religion and so on. Seriously?
Are they pointing out to those 5% to become the messiah of the rest 95%
terrorists? We have a great example by the name of Pakistan, our beloved
neighbor since 1947. The whole world knows where Dawood Ibrahim is and where
Osama Bin Laden was. Just like Pak denied having Osama in their land, they
still deny that they give shelter to terrorist outfits. When hundreds of school
children were killed in Peshawar, the people of Pakistan realized the menace
that they are feeding in their homeland. The administration only started a
crackdown on selected terrorist groups, excluding the India-centric outfits and
the ones they felt are very powerful to retaliate. It is not that there are no one in Pakistan who are speaking blatantly against terrorism, but they are too few to be ignored. So where does this solve the
problem? How many countries that are having a majority of the ‘religion of
peace’ have ‘openly’ denounced what the ISIS is doing or speak against the
Talibans or Al-Qaida? None. And those who does, gets a fatwa. Be it Taslima
Nasreen or Salman Rushdie or M.F. Hussain, none of them were spared in their
countries for speaking the truth. And those who argue about M.F. Hussain’s
treatment in a secular country like India in reference to Charlie Hebdo
massacre, I remind them that Hussain died of age as a millionaire, he was not
shot down.
![]() |
Salman Rushdie's remarks after the recent Charile Hebdo massacre |
If you think your faith wants you to kill
children, or needs to be defended from cartoonists, then you are a joke. The
world has fought two World Wars and seen millions killed before these bastards
started their ‘Jihad’. If they would actually read and interpret their
‘holy-book’ properly, they would rethink. But they won’t, there are counselors
appointed to interpret those verses differently. Our leaders also play politics
with their name. So it actually is a big nexus. Only the people of ‘that’
religion can stand up and speak against this fast-spreading disease. Your
religion isn’t taking you anywhere, your work will. Your work is your only
identity in this new world.
Islam means peace, submission, purity. The
foundation of this religion is not based on violence. The real Quran never
advocates killing people for Allah, the almighty. Each day when these cowards
kill people hiding their faces, who is insulting Prophet Mohammed more? The
cartoonists or the killers? Yes my Muslim friends, I am the same guy you know
since years. And I want to remain the same guy. Just allow me to be. Just allow
me to fight for you, defend you. But you stop defending or remaining silent for
the ones who are degrading your entire religion. Either you speak or the world
will assume that you are one of them. Remember, we have a Prime Minister who is
still questioned about what happened 13 years back, so you all will be
questioned for what is happening worldwide almost everyday taking the name of
‘your’ God. Because I never heard any of these terrorists saying that I killed
for Osama, for Dawood, for Lakhvi, they all say they killed for Allah. I doubt
Allah would be remotely proud of this.
Comments
Always proves to be true...!!!